.3. 回复:[推荐] Stirling 旅游景点音频解说 + 英文介绍 (Stirling a...pinkben(2009/7/20 20:10:08) IP:
212.* * * Point 2: Footbridge
From here, on the south end of the bridge, we can get our bearings and see all the key features around here.
Depending on the time of year, you can probably spot Stirling Castle through the trees to the south, and to the north we get our first glimpse of the Wallace monument. And, most importantly, right beneath you, you’ve got the River Forth again - the main reason why Stirling occupied such a key position.
Richard: The bridge that we’re coming across now, this is a modern footbridge, but the fact there’s no other bridge in sight from where we are at the moment really brings home just how isolated and strategically important a bridge that links northern and southern Scotland would have been in the minds of the medieval people. And here we are at the point where, really, it’s the thread that ties two halves of the kingdom together.
Neil: In fact, there’s an old English map that depicts Scotland north of the Forth almost as an island, linked to the rest of the country by just one single bridge, because if you wanted to travel through Scotland, this is where you’d have to cross.
Now, back to Edward I. As we heard, he’s installed himself as ruler of Scotland. He’s brought in taxation and possible military service, and the people are in revolt. By late summer, 1297, two rebellions are in full swing. One of the leaders is a nobleman called Andrew Murray from the Black Isle near Inverness and the other, rather better known, is William Wallace. You probably know his story from Braveheart, but historian and writer, Fiona Watson, says we need to be cautious about any representations of him, not just Hollywood’s.
Fiona Watson: Wallace himself is a bit of an enigma. I know we all have Mel Gibson’s face in our minds. But the point about Wallace is that in the 15th Century, this poem was written about him, Blind Harry’s Wallace, and that was a piece of outright overt propaganda designed to bolster up the claims of those who were against the king at the time, James III. And there is obviously a lot of the folk tales that grew up about Wallace in that, in that piece, but really Wallace becomes everyman, every superman of that period, and a lot of things that are attributed to him actually may well have happened but it wasn’t Wallace that was involved.
Neil: It’s said that the sum total of real knowledge about Wallace would probably fit on one piece of paper. He certainly wasn’t a nobleman like Murray, but he had the backing of the Church, and this was important because the Church in those days was, amongst other things, a very powerful network of landowners with men and money.
Fiona: Churchmen are allowed to go about probably easier than an armed knight. So they are linking, keeping Scotland together. But you’ve also got to imagine, you know, village halls and pubs throughout Scotland, people going, “This is outrageous! And what are we going to do about it?” People who don’t make it into the history books - that’s what I really like about this period is that you get a little tentative hint of what they’re about and what they feel.
Neil: At some point in August 1297, Wallace and Murray joined their armies together, probably near Perth. Edward’s lieutenant, the Earl of Surrey, hasn’t taken them seriously, preferring to stay south of the border. But his treasurer, Hugh De Cressingham, has been nagging for months that something needs to be done.
At last, an English army led by Surrey marches north from Berwick to meet Murray and Wallace coming south.
The English army is larger with perhaps about two hundred cavalry and ten thousand on foot. The Scots are mostly on foot, about 8,000 of them. In theory, the English should have demolished the Scots but for two factors. One was the terrain, and we’re back to the importance of geography. The area around here is built up now but its natural state is marshland.
Fiona: Although we’ve got houses everywhere, all around us, this is the Carse of Stirling, and it's a boggy mess.
Richard: Infantry can get through this. But it’s got to be fairly disciplined infantry. But remember, we’re talking about big heavy warhorses with knights in full armour - that weighs a lot. So on fairly unstable ground, if we think about you walking across even a park nowadays, when it’s squelching up around your feet, well, think about ground that’s naturally like that. Also, to cut through lots of little water channels and pools and things, so you can’t charge, you can’t deploy a great front of cavalry and charge across this because you’ll be breaking your horses’ legs, throwing men, the whole front would break up.
Neil: The other key factor was that bridge. The original Stirling Bridge was about a mile upstream from here, and the English had to cross it to confront the Scots. But because only two or three cavalry men could ride abreast at a time, this created a huge bottleneck, and Wallace and Murray made the most of it.
Fiona: The English expected to be allowed to come over the bridge and line up. The rulebook of medieval warfare was written for these huge cavalry armies, the ones with the superior numbers who were beating up other countries all across Europe, and the Scots were saying hang on a minute, no, we’re not going to play ball because we’re going to lose.
Richard: This is a new style of warfare for Europe at the time. Here, at Stirling Bridge, it’s a combination of using the site to your advantage and also using a new type of fighting, if you like, which is the pike man using long-shafted spears known as pikes, and these are being formed into large bodies that we know as schiltroms, so that what you’re presenting to the world is almost like a hedgehog appearance of long shafts with spikes on the end of them. And the horses don’t like it. So, you know, they’re shying clear of it. The knights can’t get to close to fight. They don’t like it. You know, they get really frustrated because the “blasted Scots” don’t do the honourable thing.
Neil: What’s more, there was confusion in the chain of command on the English side. On the day of the battle, the Earl of Surrey sleeps in and Edward’s treasurer, the despised Cressingham who’s been wringing all these taxes out of the Scots, is champing at the bit.
Fiona: He is down at the bridge while Surrey’s still asleep in the castle, and he sends the men over. No, so he’s still not back. Waits a while, sends them over again. But finally Surrey gets up, comes staggering down and has to do a bit of knighting, as you do, because this is going to be a glorious English victory, of course. In the intervening period, a Scottish knight in the English army who knows the area says, “Look, just give me 500 horsemen, I’ll go upstream to the ford at Drip, come behind the Scots, so we can have a two-pronged attack.” Because he thinks these guys are not going to let us line up and do the battle thing. But Cressingham says, “Look, we’ve wasted enough time. We’re just going straight over.” And it’s Cressingham who leads that army and then finally, the third time, they go across.
Richard: And, of course, this is manna from heaven for the Scots because here’s this hated figure dead.
Neil: The scene must have been horrific. Over 1,000 men probably die that day.
Richard: It is a massacre. You’ve got all these Englishmen on the south side seeing compatriots, friends, people that they’d had breakfast with, getting hacked to death on the north side. And you’re getting people in full armour trying to escape by driving themselves into the river. And, of course, the weight of the armour, you can see how deep this river is by looking across on either side of the bridge here, and these people had been pulled down and drowning.
So you’ve got a choice, you know, drown or get impaled on a pike on the other side. And the Scots really are, you know, once the impetus is behind them, there’s really no doubt about how this battle is going to go. You’ve divided the English army. You’re not allowing them to bring their superior weight of numbers to bear. They can’t charge you because their horses are going to bog down. They’re floundering around in mud. And when the blood starts flowing and the horses begin to panic, the whole of the English line begins to break up, and the Scots are able to encircle them and pick them off more or less at leisure.
Neil: The Battle of Stirling Bridge, bloody and horrendous as it was, was a glorious victory for the Scots.
When you’re ready, continue over the bridge and along South Street towards Point 3 on the map. We’ll hear what happened next as we go.
Wallace’s victory at Stirling Bridge made him a hero. It would have done the same for Andrew Murray, but he died shortly after of wounds he’d sustained in the battle. From our next stopping point, you can see the monument that was later built in Wallace’s honour. But less than a year later Edward was back and the Scots were defeated at the Battle of Falkirk. Wallace, with his ordinary background, and therefore no support from the nobles, left for the Continent to fight Scotland’s cause in the courts of Europe.
Fiona: The Scottish nobility make use of Wallace, but they don’t understand him, and when he’s outlived his usefulness, they discard him. He’s an embarrassment to them. And I think you have that same, doesn’t compute with Edward and the English, he just doesn’t fit in. And he is the only one in the Submission Agreements that right from the beginning Edward says, “He has to come and kneel before me and I make no promises” because everyone else has given life and limb. They might have to go into exile but, "Wallace, no, I want you…” They’re two of a kind.
Richard: Yes, probably, in no compromise at the end of the day.
Fiona: Yes.
Neil: The plot now thickens. Balliol is still in exile and unlikely to return. Wallace is overseas, Murray is dead, and two new characters appear on the scene: John Comyn of Badenoch, Balliol’s nephew, and the young Robert Bruce, the Earl of Carrick. They’re both appointed as guardians to run Scotland in the name of King John and, in theory, are united against Edward. But it’s not that simple because Robert Bruce almost certainly has an ulterior motive - to make good his family’s claim to the Scottish throne.
Fiona: What you see developing, 1297 onwards, is almost two parties, the Bruce party and the Balliol party, and you have these two young men with a very uneasy alliance. Because these two young men do not get on at all, and there are fisticuffs and punch-ups. You know, very unseemly, here’s Scotland trying to prosecute this war against England and the main leaders are seizing each other by the throat.
Richard Oram: But this is another thing, you know. Historians are actually very guilty for this themselves, it’s tending to forget that we’re actually dealing with young men in their early twenties, and we know what young men in their early twenties can be like. And, you know, it’s all testosterone and bravado and a lot of drink-fuelled aggravation going on. So some of the scenes that you have, you can just, you can visualise it, they’re getting themselves wound up. And these are the people who are meant to be actually putting together a united front, but they’re also still trying to outmanoeuvre the other.
Fiona: But, nonetheless, Scotland manages to maintain an equilibrium and to govern itself with Edward pushing year after year to recover the ground he lost to Wallace and, of course, Stirling Castle again playing a crucial role. Edward takes Stirling immediately after the Battle of Falkirk, just down the road, but in the next year the Scots come back at Stirling Castle and by 1300 Stirling is back in Scottish hands. And that’s the problem for Stirling. I mean the whole point about it is that it’s in the middle of the country, but that makes it very difficult for the English to supply it.
Neil Oliver: Continue walking until the street we’re on meets Ladysneuk Road and stand on the corner. That’s Point 3 on your map.